of so-called positivism or logical empiricism. I say "mainly" because I can also take
contributions from other authors, respecting my epistemological framework. In my
years of academic training I have had the great opportunity to study the different
currents of psychology, psychoanalysis and pedagogy. I am currently learning
Russian on my own. I am very motivated to learn from Russia and contribute to
Russia.
I present a brief explanation about the topic of each of my articles, first mentioning
the title of each of them and finally mentioning the journal where each article was
published and the date of publication.
In the section of the application “additional information about achievements in
various fields” I have also added this same presentation about my articles.
Specialized articles that I have written on historical-cultural psychology (Lev
Vygotsky's approach) and psychoanalysis:
1. "Transitionality, Playing, Identification and Symbolization: Winnicott and
Vygotsky" - Reveals an epistemological and methodological convergence
between Winnicott and Vygotsky regarding the notions of transitional space
and play, respectively. The bases of an integrative treatment of the two main
groups of psychological problems are proposed (cognition group and affect
group), based on the use of play as a transitional space usable in the field of
psychological treatment. Journal of Psychiatry Reform (2021-07-06),
https://journalofpsychiatryreform.com/2021/07/06/transitionality-playingidentification-and-symbolization-winnicott-and-vygotsky/
2. In spanish: “The real and concrete man: playing, object, body and
identification project” - In this article I gave my first outlines regarding the
consideration of playing and the game that I explained in the article that I
listed first. However, this article in Spanish also deals with the object in
psychoanalysis and historical-cultural psychology, which agree that there is a
cut between object and human being and that, therefore, there is no linear
relationship between the two, Namely, there is no relationship reducible to the
Input - output scheme. There are more topics that I deal with in this article:
The integral work with the unconscious image of the body (Dolto) and the
body schema (cognitive psychology) which, by the way, is also addressed by
the Argentine psychologist, psychoanalyst and psychomotrist, Esteban Levin.
Furthermore, in this article I discuss the interesting parallel between the zone
of proximal development (Vygotsky) and the area of relational possibles (P.
Aulagnier). Topía, un sitio de psicoanálisis, sociedad y cultura (2021-01),
https://www.topia.com.ar/articulos/hombre-real-y-concreto-jugar-objetocuerpo-y-proyecto-identificatorio
3. In Spanish: "From unconscious to unconscious or the four great furies" - In
this article I present how the Freudian and psychoanalytic clinic is a clinic
argued as "from unconscious to unconscious." The exercise of this “Clinic
from unconscious to unconscious” would be enough to avoid incurring