Digital citizen empowerment a sytematic literature review fusionado.pdf

Vista previa de texto
PARYCEK, P., HÖCHTL, J. & GINNER, M. 2014. Open Government Data Implementation Evaluation.
Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 9, 80-99.
PORWOL, L., OJO, A. & BRESLIN, J. 2013. On The Duality of E-Participation – Towards a foundation
for Citizen-Led Participation. The 2nd Joint International Conference on Electronic
Government and the Information Systems Perspective and International Conference on
Electronic Democracy. Prague, Czech Republic.
POSTILL, J. & SAPUTRO, K. 2017. Digital activism in contemporary Indonesia: victims, volunteers and
voices. In: JURRIENS, E. & TAPSELL, R. (eds.) Digital Indonesia: Connectivity and Divergence.
Singapore: ISEAS - Yusof Ishak Institute.
PURWANTO, A., ZUIDERWIJK, A. & JANSSEN, M. 2018a. Citizen engagement in an open election data
initiative: A case study of Indonesian's "Kawal Pemilu". In: ZUIDERWIJK, A. & HINNANT, C. C.
(eds.) 19th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research. Delft, The
Netherlands: Association for Computing Machinery.
PURWANTO, A., ZUIDERWIJK, A. & JANSSEN, M. Group Development Stages in Open Government
Data Engagement Initiatives: A Comparative Case Studies Analysis. In: PARYCEK, P., GLASSEY,
O., JANSSEN, M., SCHOLL, H. J., TAMBOURIS, E., KALAMPOKIS, E. & VIRKAR, S., eds. EGOV
2018, 3-5 September 2018b Krems, Austria. Springer.
RUIJER, E., GRIMMELIKHUIJSEN, S., HOGAN, M., ENZERINK, S., OJO, A. & MEIJER, A. 2017. Connecting
societal issues, users and data. Scenario-based design of open data platforms. Government
Information Quarterly, 34, 470-480.
RYAN, G. W. & BERNARD, H. R. 2003. Techniques to Identify Themes. Field Methods, 15, 85–109.
SALDAÑA, J. 2013. The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers, London, UK, SAGE Publications
Ltd.
SAXENA, S. & JANSSEN, M. 2017. Examining open government data (OGD) usage in India through
UTAUT framework. Foresight, 19, 421-436.
SAYOGO, D. S. & YULI, S. B. C. 2018. Critical Success Factors of Open Government and Open Data at
Local Government Level in Indonesia. International Journal of Electronic Government
Research, 14, 28-43.
SIEBER, R. E. & JOHNSON, P. A. 2015. Civic open data at a crossroads: Dominant models and current
challenges. Government Information Quarterly, 32, 308-315.
SUARADEWATA.COM. 2014. Warga Selbar Nyaris Bentrok, 4 Provokator Diamankan. Suara Dewata,
18 July 2014.
SUSHA, I., GRÖNLUND, Å. & JANSSEN, M. 2015. Organizational measures to stimulate user
engagement with open data. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 9, 181 206.
SUSHA, I., JANSSEN, M. & VERHULST, S. 2017. Data collaboratives as “bazaars”? A review of
coordination problems and mechanisms to match demand for data with supply.
Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 11, 157-172.
SVÄRD, P. 2018. Public Information Directive (PSI) implementation in two Swedish municipalities.
Records Management Journal, 28, 2-17.
VENKATESH, V., MORRIS, M. G., DAVIS, G. B. & DAVIS, F. D. 2003. User Acceptance of Information
Technology: Toward a Unified View. MIS Quarterly, 27, 425-478.
VERBA, S., SCHLOZMAN, K. L. & BRADY, H. 1995. Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American
Politics, London, UK, Harvard University Press.
VETRO, A., CANOVA, L., TORCHIANO, M., MINOTAS, C. O., IEMMA, R. & MORANDO, F. 2016. Open
data quality measurement framework: Definition and application to Open Government Data.
Government Information Quarterly, 33, 325-337.
WEBSTER, J. & WATSON, R. T. 2002. Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: Writing a literature
review. MIS quarterly, 26, xiii-xxiii.
