the findings and propositions that can contribute to the open data theories. Last but not least,
investigating the relationship among conditions and factors and how they explain citizens’ intentions
to engage with open data using quantitative surveys will also be an interesting direction for future
research.

Reference
ACE ELECTORAL KNOWLEDGE NETWORK. 2014. 2014 Indonesian Elections Case Study: Uploading
millions of C1 result forms and achieving a crowdsourced outcome. [Online]. Available:
http://aceproject.org/ace-en/topics/et/ety/copy_of_ety06/mobile_browsing [Accessed
October 31, 2016].
ALTAYAR, M. S. 2018. Motivations for open data adoption: An institutional theory perspective.
Government Information Quarterly, 35, 633-643.
BARRY, E. & BANNISTER, F. 2014. Barriers to open data release: A view from the top. Information
Polity, 19, 129-152.
BIERNACKI, P. & WALDORF, D. 1981. Snowball Sampling: Problems and Techniques of Chain Referral
Sampling. Sociological Methods & Research, 10, 141-163.
BRAJAWIDAGDA, U. & CHATFIELD, A. T. 2014. Roles of Social Media in Open Data Environments: A
Case Study of the 2014 Indonesian Presidential Election Voting Results. 25th Australasian
Conference on Information Systems. Auckland, New Zealand: ACIS.
CONRADIE, P. & CHOENNI, S. 2014. On the barriers for local government releasing open data.
Government Information Quarterly, 31, S10-S17.
DAVIES, T. 2010. Open data, democracy and public sector reform: A look at open government data
use from data.gov.uk. Open Data Impacts - Research blog of Tim Davies [Online]. Available
from: www.opendataimpacts.net/report/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/How-is-opengovernment-data-being-used-in-practice.pdf.
DECI, E. L. 2004. Intrinsic Motivation. In: CRAIGHEAD, W. E. & NEMEROFF, C. B. (eds.) The Concise
Corsini Encyclopedia of Psychology and Behavioral Science. 3 ed. New Jersey, USA: John
Wiley & Sons, Inc.
DECUIR-GUNBY, J. T., MARSHALL, P. L. & MCCULLOCH, A. W. 2011. Developing and Using a
Codebook for the Analysis of Interview Data: An Example from a Professional Development
Research Project. Field Methods, 23, 136-155.
DIETRICH, D. 2015. The Role of Civic Tech Communities in PSI Reuse and Open Data Policies.
European Public Sector Information Platform.
DUBÉ, L. & PARÉ, G. 2003. Rigor in information systems positivist case research: current practices,
trends, and recommendations. MIS quarterly, 27, 597-636.
EISENHARDT, K. M. 1989. Building Theories from Case Study Research. The Academy of Management
Review, 14, 532-550.
FRIESE, S. 2012. Qualitative Data Analysis with ATLAS.ti, London, UK, SAGE Publications Ltd.
GAMA, K. 2017. Crowdsourced Software Development in Civic Apps - Motivations of Civic
Hackathons Participants. 19th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems.
Porto, Portugal.
GASCÓ-HERNÁNDEZ, M., MARTIN, E. G., REGGI, L., PYO, S. & LUNA-REYES, L. F. 2018. Promoting the
use of open government data: Cases of training and engagement. Government Information
Quarterly, 35, 233-242.
GRAFT, A., VERHULST, S. & YOUNG, A. 2016. Indonesia's Kawal Pemilu. Elections: Free, Fair, and
Open Data. The Global Impact of Open Data: Key Findings from Detailed Case Studies Around
the World. 1 ed.: O’Reilly Media Inc.
HARTMANN, S., MAINKA, A. & STOCK, W. G. 2016. Opportunities and Challenges for Civic
Engagement: A Global Investigation of Innovation Competitions. International Journal of
Knowledge Society Research, 7, 1-15.